Thursday, October 26, 2023

The Legal Battle Unveiled: Farrakhan, the ADL, and the Semitic Discourse



The legal confrontation between Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) not only delves into complex relationships between government agencies, civil rights groups, and individual rights but also brings to the forefront the intricacies of the label "anti-Semitism." For 25 out of the 33 years of Louis Farrakhan's leadership within the Nation of Islam, they have endured accusations of "anti-Semitism." The plaintiffs argue that their work, as guided by their religious beliefs, has been unjustly stifled due to this label. This article examines the evolving definition of "anti-Semitism" as presented by the ADL, the training activities of the ADL in the law enforcement sector, and Farrakhan's stance on Judaism and Jewish people.

Louis Farrakhan's Perspective on "Anti-Semitism"

Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam, has consistently faced accusations of "anti-Semitism." He contests these allegations by presenting a narrative devoid of actions or statements that harm Jewish individuals, hinder their businesses or education, or desecrate synagogues. He maintains that his willingness to tell the truth and his reluctance to apologize for it form the basis for these allegations.

Farrakhan's quest for intelligent dialogue with those who label him "anti-Semitic" remains unanswered. He emphasizes his non-hatred for Jewish people and points to the absence of any utterances promoting harm against them in his close conversations.

The ADL's Definition of "Anti-Semitism"

The ADL plays a significant role in this legal battle. It has accused the Nation of Islam of maintaining a consistent record of "anti-Semitism" and bigotry. The issue at the heart of the matter is the definition of "anti-Semitism." The ADL defines it as acts or statements detrimental to Jewish individuals. However, the term "Semitic" historically encompasses various groups of people, including Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs, according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary. The ADL's definition narrows it down solely to Jewish people.

Farrakhan and the plaintiffs argue that this narrow definition is problematic, as it denies other Semitic groups recognition. They assert that any one group claiming exclusive ownership of the term "Semite" may be considered "anti-Semitic."

Expanding Notions of "Anti-Semitism"

The ADL's definition of "anti-Semitism" has expanded to include tropes such as Jews having too much power, disloyalty, greed, the allegation of Jews killing Jesus, accusations of using Christian blood for rituals, Holocaust denial, and anti-Zionism. These broad definitions have led to the labeling of individuals as "anti-Semitic" or purveyors of "anti-Semitism" for statements that the ADL perceives as against its interests.

ADL's Involvement in Law Enforcement Training

The ADL is deeply involved in training law enforcement personnel, having trained over 100,000 officers. This involvement extends to federal agencies like the FBI, U.S. Secret Service, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and local departments across the United States. The ADL has even influenced the curriculum of the FBI National Academy, Executive Institute, and Law Enforcement Executive Development Seminar.


The legal battle between Louis Farrakhan and the ADL is shedding some light on the complex landscape of accusations related to "anti-Semitism" and the evolving definitions that shape these claims. It raises fundamental questions about the responsibilities of organizations that influence law enforcement training, the limits of government involvement in civil rights, and the importance of safeguarding constitutional rights and the freedom of speech. The case underscores the need for a transparent discourse that respects merit and the [at times divisional] perspectives and religious beliefs.  Knowledge destroys belief, and if there has ever been a time to flex knowledge in the name of taking down entities supporting censorship and cultural/economic power structuring then that time has come.  Supporting division makers like Farrakhan is not necessary, but the 72 page docket flexes some serious muscle.


JP Mael


Saturday, August 5, 2023

Sunday, March 26, 2023

J.P. has a side-hustle


That's right, RE PERCEPTION,  Hey, it's better than gaslighting.  Check it out, JP is covering some interesting topics and invites guests from the personalities from the net that have unique takes.  

Listen to for live shows, Saturday nights, 10pm (pst) - Midnight! 

Or check his youtube page:

Friday, March 3, 2023

Hello Lovers

 Mr Midnight Movie and JP are still doing it!  Search out our current podcast on youtube:  Transparency and Merit, and you'll find all the new stuff.  Grow up, and be with your friends now!

We remember you, so return the favor and come remember us!

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Blogger Templates